Blogging Guidelines ToK

These are the guidelines for blogging entries

You will be assessed on the basis of the below criteria. Your goal is to achieve ToK criteria based on the application of one of the Knowledge Question concepts below. You MUST consider this along side your chosen blog item:

1. Reality check: can we trust our immediate knowledge about the world?

2. Purpose and value: what is knowledge for, and how can we assess its value?

3. Connections: how do different ways of knowing and areas of knowledge interlink?

4. Knower/s: how does shared and personal knowledge shape our understanding of the world?

5. Representing reality: how is our understanding of the world affected by the way it is represented?

6. Perspectives: is our understanding of the world determined by our perspective?

7. Development: how and why does knowledge develop over time?

8. Authority figures: What makes someone an expert knower?

 

(Remember that your blog must be entered by the blogging deadline for review by your peers).

Instructions:

1. In 150 or more provide a reflection of content you have identified on the internet  and relate this to one essential Knowledge Question  concept listed above. Apply ToK Ways of knowing and Areas of Knowledge based on the criteria below. Do NOT simply repeat what has been said but FORMULATE INDEPENDENT thoughts.

2.  Provide a link, insert and article or add pictures or a video to allow the reader access to        the same information.

3.  Be creative, and most important … explore something of interest and have fun!

T.o.K. Podcast Reflection Assessment Rubric

This criterion is concerned with the extent to which the Blog reflection response focuses on knowledge issues relevant to the podcast, and with the depth and breadth of the understanding demonstrated in the reflection.

  • Does the reflection demonstrate an awareness of the connections between knowledge issues, areas of knowledge and ways of knowing?
Achievement level Descriptor
0 Level 1 is not achieved.
1–2 The reflection includes very little treatment of a knowledge question and demonstrates little understanding of them. If present, areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing are merely mentioned.
3–4 The reflection includes some treatment of a knowledge question  and demonstrates a rudimentary understanding. Some links to areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing have been attempted but they are largely ineffective.
5–6 For the most part the reflection adresses a knowledge question and demonstrates some understanding. Some effective links are drawn between areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing.
7–8 The reflection consistently maintains as its focus a knowledge question. Effective links and some comparisons between areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing are drawn, so that the reflection demonstrates a good understanding of the knowledge questions under consideration.
9–10 The reflection consistently maintains as its focus a knowledge questions that is relevant. An effective link and comparison between areas of knowledge and/or ways of knowing are elaborated, so that the essay demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the knowledge question under consideration.
Advertisements